Picture
Paul Vunak once shared this illustration with me to demonstrate the fallacy of "style vs. style" thinking.  Imagine 3 experienced fighters.  

Fighter A is a professional heavyweight boxer.
Fighter B is a jujitsu wrestler.
Fighter C is a karate man.

In fight 1, It's karate vs. boxing.  The boxer is agile and fit, but when he closes the distance, the karate man snaps a kick to his groin.  The boxer, unfamiliar with the low kick and unable to block it, drops his hands in agony.  The karate man is able to kick him in the head and run away.  Winner= Karateka.

For fight 2, the karate man faces the wrestler.  He tries a kick, but the wrestler shoots in past the leg and puts the karate man on the ground.  Unable to kick or punch, the karate man tries to turn around to protect his face.  The wrestler chokes him unconscious.  Winner = Wrestler.

In fight 3, The wrestler faces the boxer.  The wrestler shoots for a double leg take down, but the boxer is able to stick jabs in his face every time.  Unable to take the boxer down, the wrestler is punched repeatedly until knocked out.

Each fighter beat another, and was beaten in turn.  Was it some flaw in "style"?  No.  Each man proved he could make his style work.  The trouble is, in a personal defense situation, what matters is what will work for you against this attacker.  If his goal is to punch you to death, maybe trading punches is not a great idea.  If he tries to pin you to the ground, maybe that's not where you want to be.  Personal Defense requires being flexible and responsive to the situation.  That is a skill that only individuals can acquire - a style can't do it.  As always, it's all about YOU!
9/21/2009 03:39:03 pm

I don't know about you, but when my kids play rock, paper, scissor, somehow one always throw out the nuclear missile that beats everything. Do you have a solution for that?

Reply
Jim
9/22/2009 10:50:20 am

Strategic Defense Initiative. AKA "SDI" AKA "Star Wars". It works if you work it!

Reply
USMC Terence
11/24/2012 03:38:12 pm

I don't think you rock-paper-scissors example really works. Karate doesn't beat boxing 99% of the time, people instinctually block the groin and most karate stances/strikes leave massive opennings for boxers. Takedowns are not stopped by jabs...ever. A wrestler would just clinch up or shoot on both and take them down if they didn't have a decent understanding of takedown defense.

Reply
JKD Man
11/24/2012 04:27:58 pm

Thanks USMC Terence.
You are perhaps missing the point, which is simply that It's not an art, but an individual that makes the difference.
If you want to believe jiujitsu or wrestling is the superior martial art, I will let you believe that. No problem.

I have known excellent boxers who would not spar with my students because they were afraid of kicks, and I have seen both jabs and groin kicks stop a takedown. I even know one individual who used a muay thai thigh kick to stop takedowns. I would not be able to do that, but he could, and did. Against experienced and skilled wrestlers who knew what he was doing, no less.

Pontificating over specific techniques or responses may be fun, but it does not negate the point which, again, is that comparing styles is not as useful as comparing the specific attributes of the fighters.

Reply



Leave a Reply.